PDA

View Full Version : Can Cannabis Kill YOU??


Sequoiacrone
November 21st, 2008, 08:21 AM
Can Cannabis Kill You?

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
In The Matter Of
MARIJUANA RESCHEDULING PETITION
Docket No. 86-22
OPINION AND RECOMMENDED RULING, FINDINGS OF
FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION OF
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
FRANCIS L. YOUNG, Administrative Law Judge
DATED: SEPTEMBER 6, 1988


Section 8 of Judge Young's "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision." Page 56 & 57 http://www.druglibrary.org/olsen/MEDICAL/YOUNG/young4.html (http://www.druglibrary.org/olsen/MEDICAL/YOUNG/young4.html)



3. The most obvious concern when dealing with drug safety is the possibility of lethal effects. Can the drug cause death?

4. Nearly all medicines have toxic, potentially lethal effects. But marijuana is not such a substance. There is no record in the extensive medical literature describing a proven, documented cannabis-induced fatality.

5. This is a remarkable statement. First, the record on marijuana encompasses 5,000 years of human experience. Second, marijuana is now used daily by enormous numbers of people throughout the world. Estimates suggest that from twenty million to fifty million Americans routinely, albeit illegally, smoke marijuana without the benefit of direct medical supervision. Yet, despite this long history of use and the extraordinarily high numbers of social smokers, there are simply no credible medical reports to suggest that consuming marijuana has caused a single death.

6. By contrast aspirin, a commonly used, over-the-counter medicine, causes hundreds of deaths each year.

7. Drugs used in medicine are routinely given what is called an LD-50. The LD-50 rating indicates at what dosage fifty percent of test animals receiving a drug will die as a result of drug induced toxicity. A number of researchers have attempted to determine marijuana's LD-50 rating in test animals, without success. Simply stated, researchers have been unable to give animals enough marijuana to induce death.

8. At present it is estimated that marijuana's LD-50 is around 1:20,000 or 1:40,000. In layman terms this means that in order to induce death a marijuana smoker would have to consume 20,000 to 40,000 times as
much marijuana as is contained in one marijuana cigarette. NIDA-supplied marijuana cigarettes weigh approximately .9 grams. A smoker would theoretically have to consume nearly 1,500 pounds of marijuana within about fifteen minutes to induce a lethal response.

9. In practical terms, marijuana cannot induce a lethal response as a result of drug-related toxicity.

Sequoiacrone
November 21st, 2008, 08:29 AM
Can you dispute the above post?

It has been over 20 YEARS since Judge Frances L Young made this decision.

What is wrong with this picture? Why isn't our government listening to the evidence?

Maybe its time for a change. Contact your legislators and copy this decision to thier emails, with your own statements regarding cannabis as medicine.

Contact your legislators and ask.

If you have facts regarding any Cannabis related deaths please feel free to send me a PM so we can investigate further.

healing energy and loving thoughts...

Sequoia :)

Sequoiacrone
May 22nd, 2009, 12:01 PM
John Walters Lied on CNN Last Night

by Bruce Mirken

On Thursday night’s edition of “Anderson Cooper 360,” former drug czar John Walters and I were interviewed separately about a new government report claiming an increase in average potency of marijuana seized by law enforcement (we’ll have a video link posted soon). I pointed out an obvious fact: When the marijuana is more potent, users smoke less, just as people typically drink a much smaller quantity of bourbon than of beer. Thus, higher-potency marijuana doesn’t necessarily mean users take in more THC. And, given that the most significant health issue connected to marijuana is the respiratory harm from smoke, smoking less to get the same effect is clearly healthier.
Asked about this, Walters said flatly, “There is no evidence of that.”
He lied. I know this won’t be a huge shock to faithful readers of this blog, but I think it’s worth putting the facts on the record.
In a study titled “Vaporization as a Smokeless Cannabis Delivery System: A Pilot Study,” (http://www.nature.com/clpt/journal/v82/n5/abs/6100200a.html) published in May 2007 by the journal Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of California researchers looked at smoking and vaporization using marijuana of 1.7%, 3.4% and 6.8% THC. Because the idea of the study was to compare smoking and vaporization, participants were guided through a standardized puff procedure.
Although the high-strength marijuana was four times as potent as the weakest, it produced a peak plasma THC level only about 20% higher, smoked or vaporized. This, the researchers wrote, suggests that either less is absorbed at the higher potency levels or there is “self-titration of THC intake,” meaning that “smokers adapt their smoking behavior to obtain desired levels of THC.” Among the evidence for self-titration, researchers found that their subjects tended “to take more puffs at lower THC concentrations” — despite having been given a fairly regimented smoking procedure to follow. Similarly, the subjective “high” reported by participants was only modestly more intense at 6.8% THC than at 1.7%.




From that Bruce Mirken of MPP
see more of this blog....


http://blog.mpp.org/research/john-walters-lied-on-cnn-last-night/05152009/